![]() We hear the phrases all the time: "Adopt! Don’t Shop!" and "Don’t Breed or Buy While Shelter Dogs Die!" In a perfect world more people would adopt animals from shelters and rescue groups and that would be the go-to option for most families. In that same perfect world, the only dog breeding taking place in our country would be done by responsible breeders who are in it not for the money, but to perpetuate breed standards (as compared to modifying breeds to the point where it is abusive and the dogs either cannot walk or cannot breathe). Ours is not a perfect world. A lot of people get dogs who come from puppy mills or huge dog breeding operations because they are either blinded by the cuteness they see or they don’t want to know where the dog came from or a combination of the two. There are, in fact, responsible breeders out there, none of whom would ever sell a dog in a pet store or in a Walmart parking lot. I know there are those who oppose all dog breeding. I simply do not because I think that’s unrealistic. I oppose irresponsible breeding and breeding with a focus on profit and with little or no regard for the well-being of dogs. We in rescue and advocacy tell the public one thing all the time: do not buy a dog from a pet store. Do not, do not, do not. We tell them that when they buy that cute puppy in the window, they are only perpetuating an industry which enslaves dogs in conditions that would make us sick if we saw pictures or actually went there. We also tell them to not buy dogs from web sites, newspaper ads or street corners and to engage in due diligence in dealing with local breeders to determine the conditions from which the dog came to make sure they are not inadvertently supporting a mill operation. In essence, we are zero tolerance when it comes to people buying puppy mill dogs. We encourage them to "just say no" and we judge people harshly who cave in to that cute little face in the pet store and who buy the puppy, sometimes for thousands of dollars. ![]() But what about how we behave as rescuers and advocates? Are we really any better than the public we are so quick to judge? Most of the people I know in rescue are those I would describe as purists. They either pull animals from animal shelters (most of which are kill facilities) to adopt them out to the public or they take animals directly from the public in order to find them new homes. In many cases they are taking the harder-to-place animals as opposed to younger or "cuter" animals and they function based solely on donations and with no taxpayer assistance. These people are surely aware of the concept of a dog auction but they have never attended one and would never even consider going to one. There is a faction in the rescue community, however, which engages in behavior which is not only as bad as buying a dog from a pet store, but is in some ways much, much worse as far as I'm concerned: I’m talking about rescuers who buy dogs at auction. I first touched on this topic very briefly in a blog I wrote in late July which caused quite a bit of uproar from people who don’t agree with me. I was on the receiving end of some pretty strong hostility and a lot of accusations. I’m okay with that. I will not be bullied. My opinions are my own and while I love dogs, my opinions on the topic of rescuers at dog auctions is based on reason and logic and not on my emotional attachment to dogs. I want to be perfectly clear on this subject. As much as those in rescue and advocacy circles are zero tolerance for people who buy a puppy from a pet store, I am equally zero tolerance when it comes to rescuers who pay large amounts of money for dogs at auction and call it "rescue." It is not. I’m not sure exactly what to call it other than a purchase, but it is not rescue. For me, it actually borders on a form of either collecting behavior at the worst and "ego rescue" at the least. I know that saying this will not be popular with many in the rescue community. So why bother? I’m saying it because I think it needs to be said, both for the benefit of some in the rescue community who can be reached and for the benefit of those who donate to rescues, thinking they are doing a good thing by helping a rescue group buy dogs at auction. (click on image to view as a .pdf file) ![]() In order to present my position on this topic more thoroughly, I reached out to some of my subject matter experts on the topic. These are people who have decades of collective experience in dealing with the puppy mill issue. They are rescuers and advocates with ties not only in the Amish community but in the dog breeding and dog auction community. They are active in seeking legislation related to mills and they are working hard to educate the public about how their behavior relates to changing or ending the mill industry. If you are a rescuer who is absolutely convinced that it is a great idea to solicit donations to buy dogs at auction, it is unlikely that reading this blog will change your opinion. So be it. If you are a person who has donated money to a rescue so the rescue can buy dogs at auction, you surely did so with the best of intentions. I just ask you to step away from your behavior long enough to consider what it is you really think you are achieving when you buy dogs at auction. The highlights of the input I received from my contacts are as follows. • Rescuers have changed the landscape of dog auctions. As recently as 10 years ago, the presence of rescuers and rescue groups at dog auctions was not the norm in most regions. Most of those present at auction were breeders who were at the auction to buy dogs to add to their businesses. That changed not quite 10 years ago in the Great Lakes region and about 6 years ago in the Midwest. Rescuers had an increasing presence at auction and were often easy to spot from the way they dressed, the way they behaved and the amount of money they were willing to spend on dogs. During this time, it was not uncommon for some in rescue get dogs for free, get "dollar dogs" or to get large numbers of dogs for small amounts of money (i.e., 50 dogs for $3. Yes you read that correctly). The presence of rescuers at auction is now extremely obvious to both the auction companies and to the breeders who are both fascinated by and repelled by the rescuers’ behavior. • The presence of rescuers at auction has completely changed the auction process itself. The rescuers are often paying more for dogs than the auction houses have ever seen before, and in some regions dogs are now brought to auctions with the sole purpose of being sold to rescues. Rescues have created a niche market of sorts due to their obvious presence at auction. They usually come with large sums of money and often announce their intent to "save" dogs "no matter what," sometimes focusing on specific breeds of dogs they favor. • The amount of money rescuers are paying for dogs at auction bears no relation to the amounts breeders are willing to pay for dogs at auction. In one auction, a rescuer paid $9,000 dollars for a female dog and her puppies. It is not uncommon for a rescue group to pay $30,000 to $40,000 at auction for 5 to 10 dogs. This willingness of rescuers to pay such large amounts of money truly leaves the auction houses and breeders laughing all the way to the bank. They don’t talk about it while the auction is taking place or while the rescuers are within hearing range. That would be foolish. They absolutely talk about it after the auction ends and transactions are finalized. The behavior or rescuers is also viewed with disdain by many breeders, some of whom are second or third generation "farmers" who are trying to make a living to pay their bills. For them, spending a thousand or more dollars for a single dog at auction is offensive. Breeders have been known to call the big money spent by rescuers at auction "disgusting" even though the economic benefit to them is obvious. • The types of dogs bought by rescuers at auction may surprise most people. There are some in rescue who have developed relationships with breeders and auction houses which enable them to get dogs who are older or injured for free or for some nominal amounts of money. Most rescuers, however, are buying pregnant dogs, dogs who have just given birth and younger, more appealing dogs, including puppies. They are not buying dogs who are older, injured or sick and who are actually in most need of rescue. Rescuers who pay big money for the "best" dogs are essentially cutting out the middleman in the sales process. They negate the need for a broker to market the dogs to a store or the need for a store to sell the dog since they are getting dogs directly from the source. In the process of doing that, they make the sale more profitable. • On a scale of 1 to 10, the behavior of rescuers at auction related to advocacy efforts to end puppy mills is a 10. When rescuers buy dogs at auction for large sums (as opposed to seeking relinquishment of dogs to them for no cost), they are paying way more than any breeder would pay and they are simply providing more funding to breeders (and the auction house) to make milling operations larger and more profitable. The argument that buying a dog at auction prevents a breeder from profiting off that dog is one-sided and completely avoids the reality of the business aspects of breeding dogs for profit. When a rescuer pays $2,000 for a dog which would ordinarily sell for $20 or even $200, they may have removed that dog from the breeding operation, but they have put more money in the breeder’s pocket to buy even more dogs and make even more money. • When asked my contacts what rescuers should be doing instead of buying dogs at auction, I was provided with this input which I have paraphrased: Rescues should avoid auctions completely. They should contact breeders and ask them to relinquish the dogs that they are done with, including the old dogs, sick dogs, disfigured dogs and puppies that they cannot sell. NO money should change hands. The rescues can then raise funds to provide the medical care these dogs will need. Only then will they truly be saving dogs. Dog auctions are a tragic embarrassment to our society and to humane-minded citizens. We have been asked if people should "buy" or "rescue" dogs at auction. Buying at auctions simply means that it will be profitable. If it is profitable, it will continue and more dogs will be bred for sale at future dog auctions. We understand compassion for the dogs being sold and know that there will be some who will buy. We understand both sides of the situation. We hope that in the long run, not buying will produce the best outcome to end these auctions altogether. Rescuers who buy dogs at auction should take a long, hard look at what they hope to accomplish. They should look at the "why" of what they are doing and ask themselves, "what is the grander plan for these dogs?" Anyone who is willing to pay $9,000 for a puppy has an ego problem. They will never be able to recoup the money paid for that dog and they have paid a breeder much, much more money that the dog may be worth to another breeder. As far as people who donate to rescues who buy dogs at auction, they should ask themselves how much good could be done with that same money to help dogs in other ways and while working to educate the public about why they shouldn’t buy mill dogs. They should consider how much good could be done to care for older, more challenged dogs obtained from breeders for free and to give them a good life. There are three kinds of rescuers: rescue as a business, rescue for ego and rescue as purity. Buying dogs at auction is not good business and it is not pure rescue. It is a purchase and it is more about ego than it is about helping dogs. When you rescue for ego, you are putting yourself before the welfare of dogs and you are putting your personal need to feel important in the way of slowing or ending the very industry you say you oppose. I believe that at the heart of every true rescuer is a desire to save animals and give them a better life. I also believe that those who donate to rescues presume that their money will be used in the best possible way to help the most animals in need. That’s how I view the donations I make. It’s time to stop enabling the puppy millers and the commercial dog breeders who treat dogs as a farm commodity to be bred, sold and bought like equipment, cotton or corn. We do that not only when we persuade the animal-loving public to say "no" to buying mill dogs. We do it when those in rescue walk away from the auction tent and focus on helping other dogs in need, educating the public and promoting legislation which changes our society related to the commercial farming of dogs. If you are a rescuer and you feel absolutely compelled to save dogs at auction, please don’t go there with your bankroll in hand and a determination that you will outspend anyone who gets in your way. Take the time to develop and foster relationships with the breeders and the auction companies so that you can arrange to have older, injured or challenged dogs relinquished to you for free. By doing that you are helping the dogs who need you most, you are not making the dog breeding industry more profitable and you staying true to the pure form of "rescue" which your donors no doubt expect from you. And then you can go back to the very important business of educating the public and supporting legislation at local, state and federal levels which seeks to make life better for mill dogs until the day that puppy mills become part of our shameful past. (images courtesy of Hector Parayuelos, Nicole Mays, PetShopPuppies and National Mill Dog Rescue)
59 Comments
Robert Schultz
11/17/2016 03:12:17 pm
I fully support National Mill Dog Rescue, an organization that saves "used up" breeding dogs. Are you saying their work is suspect and/or counterproductive? Frankly, I find that hard to believe, even though I understand your argument. Thanks!
Reply
Paws4Change
11/17/2016 04:04:35 pm
Thanks for your inquiry, Robert. I am not saying that at all, in fact. I have done volunteer work for National Mill Dog Rescue for years and consider the Straders and many of the organization leaders to be friends of mine.
Reply
Leann
11/20/2016 09:20:35 am
Really? Because NMDR attends and buys dogs at auction. So you're making them your exception?
Betsy
11/18/2016 09:55:08 am
I agree with you too--those "rescuers" paid more per dog for the 98 dogs than I did for my purebred Scottish Terrier puppy from one of the best kennels in the country with championships
Reply
Paws4Change
11/18/2016 12:21:10 pm
Thank you for your comment, Betsy. I think there are some in rescue who believe all breeding is wrong and who don't believe in the concept of responsible breeding. I am not one of those people. I have no issue with breeders who are in it for the love of the breed and who may only have a litter a year, if that. My dentist breeds Black Russian Terriers (I believe her female is currently best in breed) and she also has rescue dogs. There is a vast difference between her and the people who mass produce dogs or run mills. They are not the same at all.
Reply
Marci Bartelt
11/22/2016 06:35:08 pm
There are approximately 2.5 million perfectly adoptable dogs euthanized, gassed,or shot every year, simply because of overpopulation. Perhaps this overpopulation problem stems from the over 3 million puppies bred for money yearly. Adopt don't shop seems like a no-brainer to me. Unless you or anyone else is breeding ONLY to preserve the bloodlines and integrity of the breed, and not for money which is the vast majority of breeders, it should not be happening. Ever.
Reply
Kate
4/12/2018 10:55:07 am
Those numbers aren't really accurate. The number of dogs dying in US shelters annually is fewer than two million, about 1% of all dogs, and the near entirety of those are adolescent dogs, mostly large-breed, that have been through at LEAST one home, not infant puppies. There are more than 17 million people looking to add a pet to their family every year. There's plenty of room in home and hearts; it's less an "overpopulation" problem than it is a distribution and retention problem.
Littleblackdog5
11/18/2016 10:40:29 am
I find it very sad and confusing. What happens to the dogs that do not get purchased at auctions or pet stores. They do not know,And it is not their fault that they are in that circumstance. They are just poor little unloved critters that deserve "rescue" also.
Reply
Paws4Change
11/18/2016 12:24:23 pm
Dogs who are not purchased at auction are often given away to rescuers. Some are also destroyed. If you are familiar with the story of Harley, the 2015 American Hero Dog, he was left in a bucket to die. I agree these dogs deserve rescue. I also believe that it is important for rescues to develop relationships with breeders and auction houses to get those dogs for free which happens with a lot of rescue groups.
Reply
Randy Willoughby
8/22/2017 08:58:54 pm
If you don't buy that dog from that pet store or on line doggie store. Those puppies will not be reordered from the millers and more than likely you will get it from a shelter for a very reasonable fee.
Reply
Barbara
11/19/2016 01:17:36 pm
Years ago when I joined a Bearded Collie email list, I was upset to read that members would not "rescue" available Beardies at auctions for the reasons in the article above. I felt every dog deserved a better life, that we needed to get them out of their horrific situation. But reasonable people in the know convinced me we would be doing the wrong thing by buying these dogs.
Reply
Paws4Change
11/19/2016 02:25:53 pm
That is the way to liberate those particular dogs. Unfortunately, it simply serves to objectify other dogs and perpetuates the industry. If is simply not rescue. It is a purchase which is as bad or worse as a purchase from a pet store. I say worse because the rescuers should know better than to behave in the exact way they tell the public to not behave. Perhaps you can help persuade them that their actions are simply too short sighted.
Reply
Brooke Pope
11/20/2016 02:07:54 am
A while ago I read this article http://www.prisonersofgreed.org/Auctions.html explaining the difference between a dispersal auction and a consignment auction. "In a dispersal auction the kennel is selling out all of the dogs, the equipment, and tools and getting out of the business. In a consignment auction the kennel is selling the dogs that they do not want any longer. The money that the kennel earns from a consignment auction will be used to buy more dogs and perpetuate the misery. Although we are all very sad for the dogs who are sold at consignment auctions, it is wrong to buy them. It is the same thing as buying a dog at a petstore. It is contributing to the industry of misery." My Susie Q was bought at a dispersal auction by our local Humane Society where we adopted her from. Susie Q was sold for $60. So because it wasn't a consignment auction neither the Humane Society nor we were perpetuating a puppy mill in any way even though she was bought at auction. I can't imagine life without her and am beyond grateful she was saved from being purchased by another puppy mill to continue breeding <3
Reply
Hi Brooke,
Reply
There was a time when a dispersal sale truly meant the breeder is going out of business, but now we're seeing many dispersal sales where the breeder is just dispersing of a particular breed/breeds. The term is used to make it appear that the breeder is going out of business. Those dogs are sold, lining the breeders pockets with money so they can invest in a different breed/breeds of dogs for their operation. A complete dispersal sale sounds like a good thing, and sometimes it is, but we've seen breeders sell everything via auction, and go right back into the breeding business again (after all, often the breeding business is all they know). Beware of the "dispersal sale" being used as a marketing technique. Bottom line.... don't perpetuate the cycle!
Reply
Brooke Pope
11/21/2016 02:12:30 pm
Thank you for clarifying Rudi. It's crazy how many tactics these millers come up with and what is sometimes being done in the name of rescue :'(
Valerie Hunter-Goss
11/23/2016 06:15:08 pm
To Kim, The greyhound rescue groups hear a similar comment - "(with a temperament that, possibly at least in part, is a credit to the breeder who produced her)" when greyhounds in good mental and physical shape are surrendered to them. I can tell you it makes most of the anti-racing people want to puke! I've seen basket cases (freaks), puppies that have to be euthanized from bad breeding because they're born with a rare arthritic condition and they can barely walk, etc. It's possible some mill dogs are treated better than others but that statement about puppy mill survivors coming from 'good' breeding (or breeders) makes me ill. It sounds unfair to the dogs that have no voice!
Reply
Hi Valerie,
Paws4Change
11/20/2016 11:12:38 am
This comment relates to Leann's question.
Reply
11/20/2016 02:08:53 pm
To Brooke's comment, as a group of advocates who have attended many of the Ohio dog auctions as part of a coordinated effort with rescue, media and local law enforcement to address serious issues involving the breeders and dogs placed on the block for sale, we can attest that a vast majority of dogs we saw were most definitely frightened, injured and/or ill. We recall almost 90%, out of about 450 that day, who were visibly frightened during an 8-hour auction that we personally witnessed from the bleachers.
Reply
Barbara
11/20/2016 03:35:26 pm
I, too, would be interested in learning the physical/emotional condition of Suzie Q. For those curious about what a puppy mill dog may look like, and to read a bit about those bought by Soft Coated Wheaten Terrier Rescue, click on www.wheatenterrierrescue.org and you will see hundreds of these dogs. As the organizers of Wheaten rescue say, this is a very controversial subject (buying the dogs from the mills) and their purpose may not please all of us. They look at each dog as the opportunity to "rescue" it from a horrible life and live a life of love and care.
Reply
Paws4Change
11/21/2016 09:22:30 am
Barbara, it sounds as if the Wheaten rescue group is actually participating at auction sometimes and is not getting relinquished dogs. Can you share any information about how much the group pays for dogs at auction? I'm trying to distinguish between a $5 purchase and a $5,000 purchase.
Brooke
11/21/2016 02:46:56 pm
I wasn't there when she was purchased but I do know she was in need of dental surgery at that time. She was spayed before we adopted her. She was very afraid when we adopted her. She needed to learn to be housebroken. It has taken her 2 years, in stages, to come out of her shell and act like a normal dog. The mill she came from was equipped with climate control and walkout porches for defecating and urinating. Which I believed preserved most of her health. She was in the mill for 8 years and 10 months. We have had her for a year and 11 months. She has experienced ongoing ear infections and teeth loss.
Reply
11/21/2016 04:47:36 pm
Thank you so much Brooke for sharing this information on Susie Q. So very heartbreaking to read about her history of medical and behavioral issues. Sadly, she serves as a strong example of what we've discovered to be the case for the vast majority of dogs sold at the Ohio dog auctions.
Barbara
11/21/2016 09:45:06 am
According to the Wheaten website, the group has paid up to $600 per dog at auction. As stated therein, these dogs almost always need extensive medical care for weeks if not months. There is a link on the website discussing how to rehabilitate (emotionally) these puppy mill dogs.
Reply
Paws4Change
11/21/2016 02:39:26 pm
Thank you. It's terribly unfortunate that they continue to pay that much money for dogs needing the most care. Those are the types of dogs which would ordinarily be relinquished to rescues for free. That takes fostering of relationships, of course. Millers will continue to see the Wheaten organization as a source of revenue greater than the other breeders at auction because of the willingness to pay what is akin to ransom, at least to me. I understand the motivation to help dogs in need. I simply think it has to be balanced with behavior which does not contribute financially to the process, thereby perpetuating it, such as developing ways to get sick or injured dogs for free.
Reply
Nancy Heileman
11/22/2016 06:29:13 pm
Thank you for this insightful article. I did not know about this situation, and appreciate the education. I will share this information, and hope that it will continue to spread and help others to understand the implications. My hope is that it will also reach people who can influence rescues that currently buy from auctions. I personally do not have any connection to these types of rescues. I support three animal rescues that fall into the "purist" category. Again, thank you for your efforts to educate and inform about this - it is truly important.
Reply
The first auction I ever went to, Theresa Strader was there and helped me. The landscape has changed drastically since then, about 7 years ago. We are a rescue that does some auction rescue. The vast majority of our dogs are not auction dogs. We walk a fine line, and try never to pay so much that we are enriching breeders. We also have relationships with some who relinquish to us. When we go to auction, we are not bidding on only the babies, but on the rotten mouths, damaged limbs, overbred mamas. Our adoption fees don't go up. It costs us much more to treat auction dogs, and in Italian Greyhounds, way more time, to socialize dogs that have never been socialized. Like NMDR, we are looking for who we can get out of the life. It's brutally hard to let a dog go, especially in the moment, but we cannot become a profit center for breeders. I agree with large parts of this article. There is a new breed of dog flippers out there, and lots of "rescues" making profits. We aren't all the same.
Reply
11/24/2016 07:23:07 am
As the author of Bark Until Heard, a book detailing my very personal experience with Amish and Mennonite dog auctions, I find this blog and the many comments extremely interesting. Eight years ago, I found myself at an auction as a reporter to do a story on the protestors. They told me, "If you want to understand what we are protesting, you need to go in the barn and see for yourself." I went in the barn and my life was changed forever. I walked out with the oldest dog there for $60. The protestors also told me, "If you take a dog out of there today, the best thing you can do is share his story. Educate others." That is what I did. I have never been to an English auction, but unlike what Kim K. says above, 90% of the dogs I saw at auctions were broken. Not just in poor physical health, but emotionally they were dead. Their spirit gone. No tails wagged. No one barked for attention. Each dog I have ever fostered or adopted from a mill has been a train wreck. Currently, I have Alice sitting on my lap, who was bought at an auction in September. Her tongue hangs to the ground, she is petrified of every little thing and my vet believe she suffered blunt trauma to the head because of her crooked face. All of that said, I am not a raving fan of rescues who go to auctions with tens of thousands of dollars and come back with puppies. I believe these rescues are acting more like brokers. When we went to auctions, we looked for the old ones, the used up ones - the ones who needed a chance at a loving home. Yes, since those days I am part of a few groups who are able to work with millers (I will NEVER call them breeders because they churn out dogs for profit, not for the love of a specific breed) and get many "retired" breeders for free. However, until you are at an auction and looking into the empty soul of a dog who doesn't even try for human attention, I don't think you can say you wouldn't raise your paddle a hundred times to save that dog. While I do think the increased participation of rescues at auctions does directly contribute the profitability of millers, I do not think that it makes or breaks the business. The only way to end this horrible cruelty, is to legislate and educate it away. In a country where over 1 million healthy, adoptable dogs are KILLED each year, certainly we can agree that mass breeding is NOT NEEDED. I believe some of the best laws are being passed on a local level and prohibiting pet stores from selling mill dogs and requiring them to only "sell" rescued dogs. And while the controversy over rescuing dogs at auctions remains just as prominent as it was a decade ago, for each dog that does get out, his story gets told and I do, strongly, believe that that makes a HUGE difference.
Reply
Paws4Change
11/25/2016 10:15:47 am
Becky, thank you for your input. I appreciate your perspective. While I will agree with you that legislation is part of ending this industry as we know it, I also strongly believe that how we behave is consumers is key. When we are able to reach more people about this industry, we can help people understand that buying a dog at a store is never a good idea.
Reply
Hi Becky,
Reply
Brooke Pope
11/28/2016 02:51:24 pm
To Kim Kavin- I'd be interested to know how many dogs were at the commercial breeder where they were running and seemed happy. And also if the females and males were separated. I'd also like to know how many care-taking employees per dog there were and how each dogs health needs and bloodlines were monitored. Even in the best possible commercial-scale-breeder-scenario I have my doubts that the operators can supply each dog's needs for attention and affection. That, in my mind, is the bottom line for the entire argument here- ultimately the goal is that every dog deserves the best and nothing less will suffice. How to accomplish that is an ever changing challenge as the problem (commercial scale breeders and puppy mills) change shape and size constantly. It's good to stay on top of things, but the more we focus on single incidents as defining examples, the more we get buried in semantics and lose sight of what is truly the issue- dogs being treated as products. 12/1/2016 08:26:08 am
Hi Kim, Funny enough I have a copy of your book, but have not read it. Definitely on my to do list! I have never personally been to an English auction, but sitting next to me right now is Alice, a 5 year old Shih Tzu who was bought at one in September by a rescue who begged me to foster her. Alice is deathly afraid of anything and anyone. Her tongue hangs out of her mouth for two reasons: she has no teeth left (at only 5 years old) and my vet believes she suffered blunt trauma at some point that left her whole face crooked and perhaps a bit paralyzed. She will likely go blind because no one ever treated her dry eye (common in the breed but with proper medical care treatable) Too bad she never got that care. So, while I have never been to one, it is more than obvious to me, that some dogs are in just as bad as shape as the ones I saw a decade ago. Alice reminds me of Thorp - the dog I wrote so vividly about in my book.
Valerie Hunter-Goss
12/2/2016 02:39:54 pm
To Kim - I'd like to know how many employees are at these "commercial-scale breeders" that you're referring to? How many employees per number of dogs? I know at our local 3 shelters there are over 20 employees AND many volunteers coming and going all day long, 7 days a week. Whenever I go in they're running their tails off trying to keep up with all the care (feeding, cleaning, dishes, laundry). I don't believe the dogs stuck in commercial-scale breeding facilities are receiving the kind of care necessary to be happy & healthy. If they did it wouldn't be profitable. BTW: All 3 shelters employ an ON SITE staff veterinarian. Do the commercial breeders that you visited? If not, IMO they are 'puppy mills'! 12/6/2016 05:57:50 am
I need to disagree with one situation you describe, Kim. The dogs at the Wheaton auction may not look frightened to you, but they are not happy, and their tails are not wagging with joy. Most of those dogs are emotionally shut down and show very little emotion. Those kids holding on to the dogs in the ring have a firm grip on them so they do not jump out of their arms. They are generally not comfortable being held by people. Happy dogs do not deficate or urinate when they are picked up and held. If you ever took one of those dogs home and see how they act when not being held tight, or take one to the vet and find out the neglect they have endured, I think you might change your opinion on that point of view.
For some reason this website won't let me reply to comments individually (sorry!) so I'm going to just post one general response here to the comments below from multiple people:
This is a powerful and well-done piece. Thank you for writing and publishing it. I have been involved in shutting down puppy mills and passing legislation to regulate them. And, I have been boots on the ground at some of the largest and most deplorable puppy mills in the nation. I agree with everything said here.
Reply
Barbara
12/1/2016 10:04:14 am
I would like to comment on the 4 million dogs in shelters, most of whom will never know the comforts of a loving home. The majority of these dogs are breeds which backyard breeders (BYB's) are producing, not puppy mills. Here in California, our shelters are awash with Chihuahuas, Pit mixes, Pugs, and now German Shepherds. People do not want these dogs, period. That is one reason they lean toward buying from pet stores, online, or from private breeders. I have found the general public to be ignorant, even in today's media attempts to educate about puppy mills, irresponsible breeders, and newspaper ads. They see a cute puppy advertised and all that "knowledge" goes out the door.
Reply
Paws4Change
12/1/2016 10:19:48 am
I agree with you, Barbara. I am actually more in the trenches of the No Kill sheltering movement than I am involved with the puppy mill issue. I blogged on the correlation between mills and our tax funded animal shelters a couple of months ago.
Reply
Barbara
12/1/2016 10:37:26 am
As one who jumped on the band wagon years ago when Nathan Winograd created his No Kill movement, I find myself questioning some of the methods used by the shelters. What I have observed is that some shelters can deem a dog "unadoptable" by their own standards, not what Nathan indicated in his work. I refer to dogs too old, with kennel cough (yes, they still kill for that reason here in CA), pregnant or too young to be adopted puppies. Thank goodness for local rescue groups that take as many of these dogs as possible.
There is a lot of good conversation taking place here, and I thank Paws4Change for bringing it up. I also find it interesting that people are linking fighting puppy mills and the No Kill movement. They are right. I think there are logical links and connections, but, perhaps not the ones they are talking about.
Reply
Paws4Change
12/1/2016 12:53:28 pm
Mike, thanks for your input as always. I've allowed a lot of exchange on this one blog because I think it helps people consider opinions other than their own. I am firm on some subjects like my belief that rescues are essentially brokering dogs. I am also very much open to learning from others to help expand my knowledge base.
Reply
To be clear: My comment was not directed at you at all. I believe you and I are in 100% agreement about everything YOU said. I have not seen you bashing *all breeding* or lumping responsible hobby breeders with puppy mills. Others here have, though. So, just wanted to draw that distinction and, hopefully, articulate the damage that does.
Mary Roemhildt
4/21/2017 09:46:11 pm
Hello Mike Fry. Huge fan of yours. I met you at the screening of Nathan Winograd's Redemption No Kill Revolution film in 2014.
Reply
Thanks for your kind words. There is no simple answer for weeding out those organizations that fit with your rescue philosophy. I can only suggest that you look past the horrific pictures usually posted by those rescuing puppy mill dogs, which can bring in significant donations, due to their emotional appeal, and then ask a lot of questions. Turn off emotions, turn on the rational part of your brain and decide who to support with that rational part.
Paws4Change
12/1/2016 01:02:59 pm
Since I published this blog a few days ago, I have learned more disturbing information about the topic of rescue groups who buy dogs at auction.
Reply
Barbara
12/1/2016 01:52:35 pm
Well stated. Thank you. I support several rescue organizations from senior dog rescue to across the border rescue to Thailand rescue. I have never donated a cent to a group that buys dogs from mills, breeders, or auctions. In fact, a few years ago when my husband and I were looking for a Bearded Collie to adopt, I refused to accept a "rehome" because I felt I was not helping a dog in real need. Rehomes are not rescues, IMO. True rescue dogs come from deceased owners, neglect cases, hardship and shelters where they have been taken in to do what they are intended to do--offer shelter and hope.
Reply
For consumers, in terms of figuring out what type of rescue or breeder you're dealing with, I've found one simple tactic works wonders. Ask "how."
Reply
Mary O'Connor-Shaver
1/6/2017 10:09:13 am
Most everyone has probably viewed the recent Rolling Stones article, The Dog Factor: Inside the Sickening World of Puppy Mills." It's important to note a section relating to the Missouri auction and Bob Hughes:
Reply
Paws4Change
1/6/2017 10:40:47 am
Mary, thank you for mentioning the Rolling Stone article here. It has been widely viewed and I certainly hope it helps reach a wider audience on this very important topic in our society. We all pay for the consequences of the commercial dog breeding industry whether we are aware of that or not.
Reply
Mary O'Connor-Shaver
1/6/2017 10:55:59 am
Absolutely agree with you 100%. That $60,000 the rescuer spent will certainly purchase more new breed stock. Sadly, for every dog he "saved", dozens will suffer in silence.
Valerie Hunter-Goss
1/6/2017 12:18:53 pm
For the future since I'm not ready to adopt now: How will I know what 'rescue' groups are not spending large sums at auctions? Is there a list or do I have to rely on word of mouth?
Reply
Paws4Change
1/6/2017 03:39:15 pm
Good question. You can learn a lot from a simple Google search for media coverage of the group. Also look at the social media page. Most rescues which buy dogs at auction see nothing wrong with it and are proud of their behavior. When in doubt, email a few board members and just ask. If they are anything less than forthcoming with how they get dogs, they are engaged in fraud and misrepresentation regarding how donations are used. If you later are considering a specific rescue group, feel free to contact me and I will do some checking with my sources.
Kathleen Triplett
7/23/2017 02:58:07 pm
This has to stop dogs and cats have rights too .It is cruel the way puppy mills dog suffer , no exercise no love and basic food and water #Harleysdream
Reply
Shayla
9/17/2017 10:28:45 am
Great comments. I've attended Missouri auctions out of interest, never bought. I also move dogs off farms into rescue in Wisconsin. I know breeders with 20 to 500 dogs. I never pay for them. In addition to what's already been posted I get many younger dogs that simply are not producing puppies. Breeders just like each of us have different values, beliefs. Not one breeder is the same. Creating these relationships & doing this work has taught me more than any one thing ever has. My biggest struggle has been bringing purebred dogs into rescue & realizing that may mean another dog won't get adopted. Where does it end? All of you make valid points! Thank you.
Reply
jane
4/17/2018 06:49:15 pm
I understand the desire to rescue as many animals as possible - but if I were a donor, I would be very upset at the way my hard-earned money is used. Perhaps the rescuers have forgotten that they have a responsibility to spend that money wisely ? It sounds like the very fact that so many people donate is making this possible, which would be a terrible unintended consequence.
Reply
Barb
4/18/2018 09:48:45 am
Who can I contact if I know of a rescue that is purchasing puppies from the mills in Ohio and then bringing them up here in Michigan and selling them using the "rescue the poor puppy" as a means to do so?
Reply
10/23/2019 10:17:12 am
Im a dog breeder, with 16 dogs im considered a commercial breeder. Vistors are welcomed at my kennel it helps socialize my dogs. I agree with this article. When i first attended a dog auction, i had mixed feelings seemed a good way for breeders to sell the dogs that they didnt feel fit into thier breeding plan and puppies they didnt sell to others, at the same time i could also see breeders that used it as a dumping ground for old and sick dogs that should have been cared for and rehomed or ones that simply weren't good breeders and again should be placed in a pet home. I also saw dogs that had spent thier entire lives in a small cage suddlenly paraded in front of a 100 or so people scared to death, sad. I no longer attend these auctions, because the above article is true. I cant afford to buy a dog at the prices the rescues can and i see many many large commercial breeders, bringing 20 even 30 puppies to be sold to rescue at double the price they would otherwise get. Even though ive been accused of being one i dont like puppymills anymore than the next. i dont like back yard or uneducated breeders either. I also dont see the end of this untill money hungry and as the author called them ego driven rescues and breeders are eliminated and both caring breeders and rescues find a way to dissolve the wall of name calling and work together to change laws to make a truly better world for our canine family. I dont expect my opinion or experience to be posted after all Im the enemy.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorI am an animal welfare advocate. My goal is to help people understand some basic issues related to companion animals in America. Awareness leads to education leads to action leads to change. Archives
January 2021
Categories
All
image courtesy of Terrah Johnson
|